虽然发在space上面有点太岁头上动土的感觉，不过也懒得掩耳盗铃地再找个blog了。唯一打得微软落皇而逃的还是FairPlay一役啊，还真能死撑。

原图请见Software Wars

以下内容可以在http://www.google.com/reader/shared/14356894248794841331找到，这是我在网上的摘抄簿，保证内容新鲜有趣。你甚至还可以订阅它的CSS。

我觉得我应该开一个“无线”类别：太多东东可以把线割掉了，比如我的现任硬盘盒有一根数据线一根电源线。当我的电脑被wifi解放的时候，外置硬盘盒还是牢牢地牵制着它的移动能力。终于，华硕为我们想到了带硬盘的无线路由器，一个划时代的贡献。让我们来看看技术特性，除了无线路由、160G硬盘等看名字就知道的功能以外：

o EZ Setup enables convenient wireless connection configuration
o More secured: 64/128 bit WEP, WPA/WPA2 supports TKIP, AES, WPA, WPA2 and MAC
o Share USB printers, webcams and speakers with devices in WLAN (compatible list)
o iPod Users can Manage Music Stored in the WL-700gE with the iTunes Interface
o USB 2.0: Connect external hard drive for more storage capacity
o RAID mirroring function for data backup
o Built-in power adaptor maintains environment cleanness and saves space
o Download files from the Internet even when the PC is off
o Auto bandwidth management ensures Internet access quality
o Download 7 BitTorrent and 10 FTP/HTTP files simultaneously
o Easily share external storage capacity
o Flexible capacity expansion
o Automatically backup digital file to the external USB hard drive
o UPnP AV Server (compliant to UPnP standard, and DLNA certificate standard)
o Play video and audio files stored in the WL-700g on TV via DMA (Digital Media Adapter)
o Interoperate properly with those DMAs that support UPnP and DLNA
o Manage and play music file via iTune utility
o WMM (Wi-Fi Multimedia) enhances audio, video and voice applications over Wi-Fi network
o Create personal web pages.Quickly build photo album in 3 simple steps
o Smart Download: Download manually or automatically by setting queues
o Easily to expand hard drive capacity with internal IDE disk and external USB disk in one user-level partition
o RAID 1 enables online data mirroring 

内置DHCP server, samba server, FTP server，DDNS server, iTunes server, UPnP，所以你想做什么都可以——而且不用电脑。最厉害的是它可以自动下载bitTorrent，再也不用把电脑开过夜了。

对有兴趣和有米的同志们：现在的市场售价大概是$250。

大三的时候曾经自作聪明地去数学系听了一个学期的拓朴，因为据说拓朴是最没有用的数学。这个闭门造车的学科果然是没有用处，之后就再也没有听说过这个名词，以至刚才拼的时候还犹豫了很久是哪个”朴“……现在居然有聪明人把它用到了国防科技：

Suppose you have a network of sensors, each with a unique ID, scattered around a two-dimensional domain D---for example, D could be a region of forest, an open field, or a portion of the ocean floor. The sensors have a "broadcast radius", within which they can detect the identity of any other sensor, and a "cover radius", within which the sensors perform their sensing tasks. You can think of each sensor as surrounded by a disk whose radius is the coverage radius. The union of these disks is the "sensor cover". A basic question is, Does the sensor cover contain D?

三维立体图像，不是戴上眼镜看的那种，而是像StarTreks里面的，一个立方盒子里显示的真实三维图像。我说的不是科幻，而是现实。现在市场上已经有了数几种商业化的产品，主要用于医学造影等用途。这篇文章介绍了世面上主要的几种技术，包括旋转成象、显示区块、全息成象等……

这篇文章(PDF)更加深入地介绍了各项技术的细节、软硬件架构、技术缺陷等，值得深入研究。

我觉得最酷的是日本人做的这个：

1. We have used laser produced plasma technology to make a flashpoint in the air.
2. We have greatly improved the brightness, contrast, and production distance of the plasma by optimizing the laser beams.
3. Using a laser plasma, we have been the first to succeed in displaying "real 3D images" in a space where there is nothing but air.

1945年以前，中国是左行与右行混合的国家。总的来说，在南方省份和城市，例如上海、浙江、广东，由于受到英国的影响，左行规则更为普及；而在山东、直隶等北方省份，由于俄国、德国、美国等国的影响，大多采用右行规则。1930年代的新生活运动规定车辆靠左行驶。满洲国、蒙疆政府和日本占领区也采取左行规则。

抗日战争期间，美国全力支持中国抗日，随着大量美援汽车(左驾车)按照租借法案运抵中国，靠右行驶逐渐成为大多数司机的习惯。抗日战争胜利后，中华民国政府规定，自1946年1月1日起，全国的车辆均靠右侧行驶。这一规则也被带到了台湾。

文化大革命期间，一些城市的红卫兵认为“靠右行驶”的规则是“走右倾(资本主义)道路”，因此下令车辆靠左行驶，同时规定红灯通行、绿灯停车。这两项措施在短时期内造成了大量的交通事故，因此不久即被废止。

Reproduced without explicit agreement of both authors, hence no further reproduction is permitted.

I'm a new user (or editor) of wikipedia, and one thing I found fantastic of zh- wikipedia is that every Chinese speaker, despite his/her living circumstance and dialect background, can work together to create a Chinese version of knowledge base. I mean, throughout thousands of years, we have been creating, developping and sharing our culture in one single form of language, why should we interrupt this tradition by splitting our culture into several, even hundreds of forms? Or perhaps I should soften my tone, anyway I think it's too hasty to build up the dialect versions when the "written Chinese version" is still far from being mature. --(user:Demos in zh.wikipedia)193.252.199.51 17:54, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

I don't think it's a good reason to oppose. I also eagerly hope to see zh.wikipedia to become better and better.But I want to see that we become better because of our efforts and not by the oppression of other Sinitic languages.Cantonese, Minnam, Wu etc. and Mandarin Chinese are brothers or sisters in Sinitic languages family.I think that we should let them to develop together like Germanic,Romance or Slavic languages. --Ffaarr 01:10, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

I appreciate your idea of brotherhood of Sinitic languages. But I think since the "dialects" of Chinese existed and flourished largely, if not only in the form of spoken language, why there's such an emergency of expressing themself writtenly, otherwise being oppressed? In my opinion, the effort would better be made on the study and preservation of their oral form, which is their most living form. Plus, I'm afraid that after the creation of dialect forms of wikipedia, the major work carried on the Chinese wiki world would be merely completing the basic items in different dialects which are under the description of "essential". Are these efforts really essential, even in terms of preserving the dialects? Similarily, I see no significance of preserving Chinese characters by restablishing math formulas in them. Moreover, story of the Babel tower insinuates that the split of languages is originally an effort to prevent us from acquiring the knowledge (or power). That's also a reason why I show up to oppose this proposal, as it seems to me as kind of omen:) Well, believe me not.--193.252.199.51 23:06, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

I agree that oral form is very important.But why is writing them not allowed, especially like Cantonese which has been written for decades? If there's no in one language want to write.It's ok. But now many users(at least in Cantonese and Wu)wanted but not allowed.

I think that making an wikipedia is not primarily for preserving these languages,but for making people get knowledge through his or her own langauge.

Every wikipedia has to start with basic items.If it is not allowed, the zh.wiki and any other wiki would have not appeared.If you are not intersted in these wiki, no one will compel you to join. But now, some people want to do it and think it is meaningful.Why stop them? Or you think that we should compel them to work instead in zh.wiki?

The Babel tower story is interesting.But in modern world, the situation is just the oppsite.People around the world learn English, and many languages are gradually replaced by powerful languages.In mainland China, Hongkong and Tainwan, with formal education of Mandarin Chinese(普通話or國語, there is no reason to worry about that we will be unable to communicate knowledge with each other.--Ffaarr 01:32, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

Well, originally I just intended to oppose the effort to seperate our strength in building the Chinese wikipedia. As for the fact that this debate has risen to the level of freedom of speech, I'd rather shut up my mouth. As Voltaire said, I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. To be clear, I withdraw my opposition.

But, I still regret your choice of desolving the force that we just manage to accumulate. In fact I've read some articles in the Zh-Yue version, and finally I find that apart from some empty words and the sequence of words, a large part of the contents are written in the same vocabulary as Mandarin. Actually I had never learned Cantonese, but I still managed to understand the most part of the contents, even the more oral discussions. Then I think it still not idiot to ask if really rewrite so many Chinese articles in Cantonese by merely changing the form of acclaimations worth the efforts. Not to say that most educated Hongkongnese or Taiwanese or Cantonese can equally, if not more, easy to read in continental Written Chinese, just as you said.--Demos 01:53, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Although I tried to persade you, I respect your opinion.If some of my word were too harsh, I apologize for it.

I think that similarity between languages are better reason to oppose than “desolving the force " For me, I may guess the meaning of Cantonese( from 60% to 80% maybe like Swedish people for Nowegian or French people for Wallon).But I really think they are different languages even for written form.( for differences in vocabulary, grammar etc.)--Ffaarr 09:57, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Sorry... "resolving the strength" would be a better expression. I think the difference between us is that we regard wikipedia differently as a tool. Anyway, nice to meet you, and so long.--Demos 12:17, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

不过照我看来，Wiki中文的传奇年代已经过去，现在是渐渐趋向平民化的过程中。这又回到了政治问题上来，互联网这个平民世界也要建立它的社会制度，而在混沌的世界获取权力最便利的方法就是割据。最近的热门话题是分版，粤语、闽南语想要建立独立的语言版本，而在元维基上投票

[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposal_for_Sinitic_linguistic_policy]